Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Injury Law Group NW Issaquah Personal Injury Attorney
  • Injury Law Group NW
  • ~
  • Call or Text for Free Confidential Consultations
  • ~
  • Translate Page

Issaquah Product Liability Attorney

People in Issaquah who were hurt by a defective product face a decision that most injury victims never have to make: figuring out who, among several companies, actually answers for the harm. Issaquah product liability attorney work starts with that question. Injury Law Group NW is a personal injury firm that represents injured people and grieving families in Issaquah, throughout King County, and across the greater Seattle area, and the same investigative discipline that drives our construction, vehicle, and medical cases applies when a manufactured item fails and someone is hurt.

Product cases differ from a typical crash or fall. There is often no negligent driver or careless property owner to point to. Instead the question is whether the product itself was unreasonably dangerous because of how it was designed, how it was built, or what the maker failed to tell users about its risks. A bicycle helmet that fractures on impact, a space heater that ignites a bedroom, a tire that separates on I-90, a ladder that buckles under a worker, a power tool with a missing guard, and a pharmaceutical with an undisclosed side effect all raise different technical problems. The defendants are usually well-funded companies with engineers, testing data, and insurers who have defended similar claims many times.

Why Choose Injury Law Group NW for a Product Defect Claim

Injury Law Group NW represents people hurt by someone else’s negligence throughout King County and the Puget Sound region, and our attorneys came to this work from the other side of the table. Founding partner Troy Hunter spent 16 years in insurance defense litigation, mostly as a partner at Floyd, Pflueger & Ringer, defending insurers and corporate clients against personal injury, wrongful death, fire loss, and construction defect claims. Attorney David D. Mordekhov spent two decades at the Seattle defense firm Gardner Trabolsi & Mordekhov, trying wrongful death, catastrophic injury, and product liability cases before judges and juries across Washington.

It matters because product defendants fight in predictable ways. They argue the product was misused, that the user was partly to blame, that the item was too old, or that a different company in the supply chain is responsible. Lawyers who have built those defenses know which arguments carry weight and which are posturing. Both Troy and David are rated AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell. David has been selected to the Super Lawyers list and teaches trial and deposition skills as faculty at the National Institute for Trial Advocacy. Troy also serves as a dispute mediator. Our attorneys have argued at every level of the Washington court system, from district court to the Washington Supreme Court, and the firm is a member of the Washington State Association for Justice. Associate attorneys Warren Barreiro and Hannah Shergold complete the legal team, supported by case managers who return calls and texts promptly.

We prepare every claim as though it will go to trial, because manufacturers and their insurers pay more fairly when they know the other side is ready to try the case. Our results reflect that approach, including more than $1 million recovered for parents whose newborn died after a hospital failed to adequately test for Group B Strep, a case that also led the hospital to change its procedures. Clients describe us as responsive, honest, and clear. David speaks Russian and has represented Russian and Ukrainian speaking families, and Warren speaks Spanish. Consultations are free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee, so you owe no attorney fee unless we recover money for you. Past results do not guarantee a future outcome.

Kinds of Defective Product Injuries We Investigate

  • Design Defects: The danger is built into every unit because the design itself is unreasonably unsafe, such as a vehicle with a roof that crushes in a rollover or a tool without a feasible safety feature. These claims turn on whether a safer alternative design was available.
  • Manufacturing Defects: One unit, or one batch, departs from the intended design. Examples include a weld that fails, a contaminated lot, or a brake component cast with a flaw. Retained evidence and lot numbers are critical.
  • Failure to Warn: A product may be dangerous because users were not told about a risk, or were given instructions too vague to prevent harm. Medications, chemicals, ladders, and children’s products often generate warning claims.
  • Vehicle and Tire Failures: Tire tread separations, airbag malfunctions, sudden acceleration, and faulty seat belts can turn a survivable I-90, I-405, or I-5 collision into a catastrophic one. These cases often run alongside a crash claim against a driver.
  • Workplace Equipment and Tools: Scaffolds, ladders, forklifts, cranes, nail guns, and power saws on construction sites can fail through defective parts or missing guards. A defective-equipment claim against the manufacturer is separate from workers’ compensation and can provide compensation beyond it.
  • Household and Consumer Goods: Space heaters, batteries, e-bikes, appliances, cribs, and kitchen products can cause burns, fires, lacerations, and worse. Lithium battery fires have become a growing source of serious home injuries.
  • Medical Devices and Drugs: Implants, surgical hardware, and prescription medications can injure patients when they are defectively made or inadequately labeled. These claims sometimes overlap with medical malpractice, and sorting out which applies is part of early case work.
  • Brain and Catastrophic Injuries: Helmet failures, falling equipment, and vehicle defects can cause traumatic brain injuries that do not always show up on a scan. Proving the long-term effect requires medical and vocational evidence.

What to Do After a Product Injures You

The single most important step, after medical care, is to keep the product. Do not throw it away, return it to the store, send it back to the manufacturer for a “free replacement,” or let anyone repair it. The product is the central piece of evidence, and once it is gone the defense will argue there is no way to prove it was defective. Store it in its current condition, along with packaging, manuals, receipts, warranty cards, and any inserts. If the item was destroyed in a fire, preserve the remains and photograph the scene before cleanup. Note where and when you bought it and whether anyone else handled it.

Get examined by a doctor even if the injury seems modest, and tell the provider exactly how it happened. Photograph injuries as they change, and save every bill. If the injury happened at work, report it to your employer and pursue the workers’ compensation claim, then talk to a lawyer about a separate claim against the equipment maker. If it involved a vehicle, ask that the vehicle be held rather than sold for salvage, since data recorders and component evidence can disappear quickly once an insurer takes possession.

Be careful with the manufacturer’s insurer or a retailer’s claims representative. They may ask for a recorded statement, offer a quick payment, or request that you ship the product for “testing.” Any of these can damage your case. Our attorneys spent years on the defense side and know how those conversations are used. We can arrange for independent engineering inspection under a protocol that protects the evidence.

Timing matters. Washington’s product liability statute generally bars a claim brought more than three years after you discovered, or with due diligence should have discovered, the harm and its cause. Separately, if the harm occurred more than twelve years after the product was delivered, a presumption arises that its useful safe life had expired, which a claimant can rebut only by a preponderance of the evidence. Certain tolling rules can extend deadlines, including for minors and for people legally unable to understand the proceedings. If a government entity owns or maintained the product or equipment, a formal claim must be presented to that entity first, followed by a 60-day waiting period before suit. Where a claim does proceed to litigation in King County, serious injury cases are filed in King County Superior Court, which sits in Seattle and Kent. Because these timelines interact, contact a lawyer early.

How Product Liability Differs From Ordinary Negligence

In a standard injury case, you prove someone failed to use reasonable care. In a product case, the focus moves from the conduct of a person to the condition of an object. Washington’s product liability framework looks at whether the product was not reasonably safe in design or construction, or lacked adequate warnings or instructions. That shift changes how cases are built. Instead of reconstructing a driver’s decisions, we examine testing records, engineering standards, prior complaints, recalls, and the feasibility of safer alternatives.

Responsibility can also reach beyond the manufacturer. Washington law reaches product sellers and others in the chain of distribution, with different rules for different roles, and a retailer who simply passed along a sealed item is not treated like the company that designed it. Identifying every responsible party matters because the manufacturer may be out of state, overseas, or insolvent, and a claim against a closer defendant may be the realistic path to recovery.

Washington also applies comparative fault. Fault includes misuse of a product, unreasonable assumption of risk, and failure to mitigate damages, so defendants routinely argue the injured person contributed to the harm. Under the comparative fault statute, your recovery is reduced by your share of fault, but it is not barred. If a jury found you 20 percent responsible, you would still recover 80 percent of your damages. Product defendants tend to overstate “misuse,” which is why we examine whether the use was reasonably foreseeable to the manufacturer.

Compensation can include past and future medical care, lost wages and lost earning capacity, and pain and suffering. When a defective product kills someone, the personal representative may bring a wrongful death action for the benefit of the surviving spouse or domestic partner and children, or if there are none, parents or siblings, and a survival claim may address the decedent’s own losses before death.

Product Liability Questions From Issaquah Families

What counts as a product liability claim?

It is an injury claim based on a defect in a product rather than on someone’s careless act. The defect can be in the design, in the way a particular unit was manufactured, or in the warnings and instructions that came with it.

How long do I have to file a product liability lawsuit in Washington?

Generally no more than three years after you discovered, or reasonably should have discovered, the harm and its cause. Tolling rules can change the calculation for minors and some others, and claims involving government-owned products require a formal claim and a 60-day wait first.

What is the twelve-year rule?

If harm occurs more than twelve years after a product was delivered, Washington presumes the product’s useful safe life had ended. You can rebut that presumption with evidence, but the burden is yours, so older equipment cases need careful early review.

Who can be held responsible for a defective product?

Possibly the manufacturer, the maker of a defective component, a distributor, or a retailer, depending on the facts. Identifying each party in the chain is part of our early investigation.

Do I have to prove the manufacturer was careless?

Not in the same way as an ordinary negligence claim. The focus is on whether the product was not reasonably safe in design or construction or lacked adequate warnings, though negligence theories may still be pleaded alongside.

What if I was using the product in a way the maker did not intend?

Misuse is a recognized part of fault in Washington and can reduce your recovery. It does not automatically defeat a claim, especially if the use was reasonably foreseeable. We evaluate whether the manufacturer should have anticipated it.

I was hurt on a construction site by defective equipment. Can I sue besides filing workers’ compensation?

Often yes. A claim against the equipment manufacturer or another third party is separate from workers’ compensation and can provide compensation beyond what that system pays.

Should I send the product back to the company for inspection?

No. Do not return, repair, or discard it. Once it leaves your control, the evidence may be altered or lost, and the defense can use that against you. We can arrange neutral inspection with a preservation protocol.

What if a recall was issued for my product?

A recall can be strong evidence the manufacturer knew of a hazard, but it does not by itself decide your claim, and failing to respond to a recall notice may be raised by the defense. Keep any recall notice and tell us about it.

Will my health insurance cover treatment while my claim is pending?

Often yes, and if the injury involved a vehicle, personal injury protection coverage may also help with medical expenses and some lost wages. We work to coordinate these sources so bills are handled while the claim moves forward.

How much does it cost to hire your firm for a product case?

The first consultation is free and confidential. We handle injury cases on a contingency fee, so you owe no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you.

Can a family bring a claim if a defective product caused a death?

Yes. A wrongful death action is brought by the personal representative for the statutory beneficiaries, generally within three years of the date of death.

Serving Issaquah and Surrounding Communities in Product Injury Cases

We represent injured people throughout Issaquah and across King County, from the Issaquah Highlands and the neighborhoods near Lake Sammamish to Squak Mountain and the Newport Way corridor. On the Eastside we serve families in Sammamish, Bellevue, Redmond, and Kirkland, and we regularly help clients from Seattle and the broader Puget Sound region. Residents of Kent, Renton, and the communities south and east of Seattle also come to us after being hurt by defective vehicles, tools, appliances, and equipment. If your injuries make travel difficult, we will meet you at home or at the hospital. Many of these cases begin with a family trying to make sense of a product that failed, and we work with clients wherever the injury occurred and wherever the responsible company is located.

Talk With an Issaquah Product Liability Lawyer Today

If a product injured you or took someone you love, call or text Injury Law Group NW for a free, confidential consultation with an Issaquah product liability lawyer. We will listen to what happened, tell you plainly what we see, and explain what needs to be preserved right now. Our attorneys know how manufacturers and their insurers evaluate and defend these claims, and we build every case as though it is headed to trial. We give hope. We get results.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Skip footer and go back to main navigation